Why Obama is Right and the Right are Wrong.

22 06 2009

(Cross-posted to LiveJournal)

 

I’m not a fan of Barry O.

To clarify, I didn’t vote for him. Not only because I’m a big fan of John McCain, a great American patriot, war hero, and statesman – I still wouldn’t have voted for him if the Republicans had gone with Paul, or Giuliani, or Huckabee, or the Thompson Twins (either of them). If my state had open primaries, I would’ve even voted for Hillary as a protest vote against him. The only way I’d have ever put a check mark next to his box (in a totally hetero way) would be if the GOP had nominated Romney, or if Edwards ran as an independent and was polling above the Republican.

I disagree with nearly everything he stands for, and I don’t like him personally. He built himself up as a Messianic figure, fully equipped with a personality cult, and after a few months of scrutiny, it appears that the emperor has no clothes on. He’s a false prophet, and a mere mortal. He is flesh and blood like you and I, and he makes mistakes just the same.

However, his stance on Iran is not one of them.

In a country where the opposition shout Allahu Akbar! every night, it is clear that the people rioting in the streets aren’t doing it for us. Moreover, they’re not doing it because they’re opposed to Islam, or clerics in general. Mousavi is a cleric. Rafsanjani is a cleric. The only major figure in Iranian politics who does not come from a religious background is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and they’re certainly not fond of him.

While the reformists in the opposition are certainly more pro-Western than the government, having the President of the United States throwing his support behind the opposition could push fence-sitters to the government’s side. While the college-educated women fighting for emancipation aren’t likely to shout Marg bar Amrika! any time soon, their aims will not be successful without more powerful figures joining their cause. And in order to be powerful in a dictatorship, you have to be a part of the establishment… an establishment that hates Israel more than anything, and by association the United States and the United Kingdom.

We were the ones who propped up the unpopular Shah as their monarch before the revolution. We had our chance to get involved. Our parents’ generation, in a moment of utter stupidity voted for Jimmy Carter and threw that useless fuckbucket into the White House. As a result, when the Shah was forced out of office, he never returned to power… and then when the Iranian revolutionaries held Americans hostage for over a year, we did nothing to stop them. It wasn’t until Ronald Reagan was elected that they backed off and let the Americans go.

Ronald Reagan was more forceful than Jimmy Carter, and certainly more forceful than Barack Obama is going to be. Force is what tyrants rule by, and force is what they understand. While it’s absolutely necessary for the Iranian people to know that the world stand in solidarity with them, the American government needs to remain as quiet and reserved as possible for the time being, because there is absolutely nothing they can do to weaken the Iranian regime short of an invasion. We can’t sever diplomatic ties. For starters, we haven’t had an embassy in Iran in decades. We are represented by the Swiss embassy. Secondly, President Obama ran on a campaign of promising to negotiate with the Iranian government. If he were to turn his back on that pledge, he would only do further damage to his reputation, as he’s already burned bridges with the Jewish and homosexual communities after going back on campaign promises.

So, the two men that I voted for President in 2004 and 2008, George W. Bush and John McCain have gone after President Obama and his reserved way of handling the situation,  and I find their remarks unfortunate. Congress voting on a measure to condemn the Iranian government isn’t going to help the men and women in the streets of Tehran. Iranians must do this for themselves. The only thing foreigners can do is what they are already doing: Helping combat the government’s attempts to block their internet access from Twitter, Facebook, and other sites that they are using for communication. As long as they are able to organize, I don’t see the government winning. These are people who are willing to die.

Even Mousavi, the establishment figure who led Iran as Prime Minister during the war against Saddam Hussein has said that he is willing to become a martyr. His fate, and the fate of his followers are in the hands of the Iranian Army and the Revolutionary Guard. So, while Mr. Mousavi may not have screamed Marg bar Amrika! as he stood atop a car last night, many of the people he is going to need to win over are still very anti-American and anti-Western. Once the Iranian revolt has an American flavor, all those who have died and will die will have done so in vain as the protests are condemned to fail.

We lost our bargaining chip in Iran in 1979. If we’re not able to accept that and watch from the sidelines, more people will lose their lives.

So at the risk of sounding like Alan Colmes, the left is right and the right is wrong.

 

…I think I need to take a shower now.





Reflections on 2008

1 05 2009

I remember being told when I was growing up that “You catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar.”

Now, if we had that phrase in New York City, I’m relatively confident that the rest of you have it in the heartland of Middle-America.

Nowadays, you have Republicans pissing and moaning about how we need more Sarah Palins, more Rush Limbaughs, and more Rick Santorums, as opposed to your John McCains. McCain, they claim, was a RINO [read: Republican In Name Only] and as such, the fake wishy-washy centrism of Sen. McCain is what doomed their brand in 2008, forcing America and, by association the rest of the world to suffer for four or even, God help us, eight years of teleprompter torture and South Side of Chicago socialism.

As is usually the case, the truth is much less convoluted. George W. Bush extended the War on Terror into Iraq. He poisoned the Republican brand with his ineffective manner of speaking and inability to sell his own point of view, effectively dooming his actions to low popularity among the populace, especially given the left-leaning nature of the mainstream press who were more than happy to crucify him in the court of public opinion.

Now, I voted for George W. Bush over John Ketchup, and I’d do it again in a heartbeat. It’s the old lesser of two evils routine. That being said, you only have George W. Bush to blame for Barack Obama being President today. The same George W. Bush that launched an offensive, and arguably racist ad campaign against John McCain in 2000 turned out to be the one to torpedo the Republican Party in 2006 and 2008. Even in Florida, where Bush’s brother, the former governor remains highly popular, Obama managed to beat McCain on an outsider’s message of change. McCain wasn’t seen as the moderate who would be willing to cooperate for the good of America. The Democrats were effective in branding him McSame, insisting that his election would amount to a third term for Bush. In essence, what the talking heads on TV and the radio aren’t telling you, is that John McCain was seen by the voting public as too conservative. Whether that’s true or not isn’t the issue. What matters is that he certainly didn’t lose because he was an open-minded guy who was able to cooperate with Democrats in order to get things done.

John McCain, for whatever his faults, is the ultimate outsider. He’ll cross party lines whenever he believes it’s for the good of Arizonans and the American people as a whole… and, despite never having achieved a very high level of popularity in his home state, he has always steadfastly refused to add any pork projects for Arizona to Senate legislation. Whether you agree or disagree with the man on a particular issue or not, he has always been a man of honor, principle, and bravery.

While no politician is pure as snow, and they are all crooked to varying degrees, John McCain was simply the best choice the GOP had both in 2000 and 2008… and to have a patriot like him slandered for no apparent reason other than to make him the scapegoat for their own failures is ridiculous. Sarah Palin would not have won the 2008 election were the names on the ticket flipped. No Republican alive could have done any better than McCain did in the climate we’re in today. Not Romney, Not Rudy, and not the Huckster. Each and every one of them had their own flaws. Rudy being a philandering libertarian from a very liberal city, Romney for being knee-deep in big business, a flip-flopping fraud, and a Mormon to boot, and Huckabee being a likeable theocrat, but a theocrat nonetheless.

And yet, if you listen to talk radio or Fox News, you’ll hear people chiming in that the Republican party needs to move more to the right and marginalize people like John McCain and his daughter Meghan who dare speak out in calling for a more centrist approach, calling them pejoratives and throwing them under the bus when really, the situation we’re in now is all of our faults.

And if you think you’re going to win back Congress and the White House in 2012 by offering the people vinegar, get used to Barry’s change you can believe in.